What Judges Look For
By Dan Radler, L.I.S.T.D Ballroom & Latin and a Registered World Class Adjudicator
The criteria that a judge might choose to consider are actually too numerous to examine individually in the brief time allotted, since at least six couples are being judged simultaneously. Therefore, the judge must rely on the impression each couple makes relative to the others. The experienced judge, having seen and studied dancing at all levels, can quickly assess these factors collectively:
Posture – one of the most important aspects. Good posture makes you look elegant and exude confidence. It improves balance and control, and allows your partner to connect well to your body in the dances. One’s competition result is often directly proportional to one’s postural correctness.
Timing – if a couple is not dancing on time with the music, no amount of proficiency in any other aspect can overcome this. The music is boss.
Line – by this we mean the length and stretch of the body from head to toe. Attractive and well executed lines, either curved or straight, enhance the shapes of the figures.
Hold – the correct and unaffected positioning of the body parts when in closed dancing position. For instance, the line of the man’s arms should be unbroken from elbow to elbow. Also, there should be symmetry of the man’s and woman’s arms coming together to form a circle, which, although changing in size, should remain constant in shape so that the dancers remain in correct body position relative to each other. The silhouette of the couple should always be pleasing.
Poise – in ballroom dancing, the stretch of the woman’s body upwards, outwards and leftwards into the man’s right arm is to achieve balance and connection with his frame as well as to project outward to the audience.
Togetherness – the melding of two people’s body weights into one, so that leading and following appear effortless, and the dancers are totally in synchronization with each other.
Musicality and Expression – the basic characterization of the dance to the particular music being played and the choreographic adherence to musical phrasings and accents. Also, the dancer’s use of light and shade to create interest value in response to these accents and phrases.
Presentation – does the couple sell their dancing to the audience? Do they dance outwardly with enthusiasm exuding their joy of dancing and confidence in performance? Or do they show strain and introversion?
Power – energy is exciting to watch. But the energy must be controlled, not wild. For instance, powerful movement is an asset in waltz or foxtrot, but only if it is channeled into the correct swing of the body, not just by taking big steps. The lit of the music must be matched by the action of the body. In a waltz, for instance, the dancer’s body action must clearly show the influence of the one down beat and two up beats. So the release of power into the beginning of a figure must be controlled and sustained during the rise at the end of the figure.
Foot and Leg Action – the stroking of feet across the floor in foxtrot to achieve smoothness and softness; the deliberate lifting and placing of the feet in tango to achieve a staccato action; the sequential use of the four joints (hip, knee, ankle and toes) to achieve fullness of action and optimal power; The bending and straightening of knees and ankles in waltz to create rise and fall; the use of inside and outside edges of feet to create style and line –all fall under this most important of categories.
Shape – shape is the combination of turn and sway to create a look or a position. For instance, in foxtrot, does the man use the appropriate shape on outside partner steps to enable the body contact to be maintained?
Lead & Follow – does the man lead with his whole body instead of just his arms? Does the lady follow effortlessly or does the man have to assist her?
Floorcraft – this refers not only to avoiding bumping into other couples, but the ability to continue dancing without pause when boxed in. It shows the command of the couple over their choreography and the ability of the man to choose and lead figures extrinsic to their usual work when the necessity presents itself.
Intangibles – such as how a couple “look” together, whether they “fit” emotionally, their neatness of appearance, costuming, the flow of their choreography, and basically whether they look like “dancers”; all have an effect on a judge’s perception and therefore on his/her markings.
Different judges have different predictions in what they want to see and they weight those factors differently. Because a judge sees each couple for only a few seconds, anything that draws the attention, either positively or negatively could very well be the deciding factor on how the couple is marked. The use of a panel of expert judges usually insures that the end result is the correct and equitable one.







Emerald Ball Dance Sport Championships
While we would later be informed that this was the first time this particular competition enjoyed so many entries (nearly 12,000 entries and over 1,300 pro/am, amateur & professional competitors to be exact), we didn’t quite feel the impact in the divisions in which we competed so much as in the scheduling; we danced at about 10:30PM both Friday and Saturday evening. Nonetheless, the Emerald Ball Dancesport Championships is certainly a high point on the competition calendar. All of the competitive couples vying to be seen and ranked, make a point to attend this event.
We’ve attended events before where the turnout of competitive couples numbered 20+. However this time, there were only 14 contenders in the Pre-Championship division and 12 dancing in the Open International Standard. Make no mistake; while there were not many competitors, everyone who does attend the Emerald Ball is primed, polished and ready to compete. It can be refreshing to know you’re up against couples who have taken great care to prepare themselves and their routines. In the end, we were proud to finish 2nd in Pre-Champ and to have danced in the semi-final of the Open division.
Check out the highlights from our Quickstep – Emerald Ball 2011 – courtesy of SuperShag Video and Tango – Emerald Ball 2011 – courtesy of SuperShag Video. Here is a snippet from our Waltz – Emerald Ball – courtesy of SuperShag Video. It was our first time dancing Open Standard Intl. Championship, and we were pleased to share the floor with our friends (and the first place couple!) Igor & Roxanne. Here’s a taste of us both dancing in the semi finals during the Quickstep, Open Standard Champ – Emerald Ball – courtesy of SuperShag Video.
I had the pleasure of meeting Kamena from Ballroom Fantasy: interview with Kamena & Holly Miller – Emerald 2011. Stay tuned because I have a feeling her smiling face at future competitions to come.